Incidence and outcome of periinterventional atrial fibrillation in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention

Abstract

Abstract Background Peri-interventional atrial fibrillation (AF) may be detected in patients with ST-elevation myocardial infarction (STEMI) undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). Data on the thromboembolic risk and long-term clinical outcome in patients with AF limited to the peri-interventional period is scarce. Purpose To assess the incidence and impact on long-term clinical outcome of peri-interventional de-novo AF in STEMI patients. Methods and Results This retrospective single-center cohort study included all patients who underwent PCI between January 2016 and November 2020 (n=491) due to STEMI. Patients were stratified to three cohorts of AF status: Pre-existing AF: n=42 [8.6%], newly diagnosed peri-interventional AF: n=56 [11.4%] and no AF: n=393 [80.0%]. Patients with newly diagnosed peri-interventional AF as well as patients with pre-existing AF had in median a mild-moderately reduced left ventricular ejection fraction (LVEF), patients in sinus rhythm in median a normal LVEF. During the average follow-up time of 4.7 years (min. 2 years, max. 7 years) the rate for readmission for AF or occurrence of AF without hospital admission was increased in patients with peri-interventional de-novo AF or pre-existing AF (n=6 [10.7%], n=10 [23.8%]) compared to those in sinus rhythm n=22 [5.6%] (p<0,001) The occurrence of ischemic stroke was higher in patients with peri-interventional de-novo AF (n=2 [3.6%] or with pre-existing AF (n=2 [4.8%]) compared to those in sinus rhythm (n=6 [1.5%]. (p=0.256) The risk of cardiovascular death was significantly higher in patients with newly diagnosed peri- interventional AF compared to patients with pre-existing or no AF (n=13 [23.2%], n=5 [11.9%], n= 37 [9.4%]) (p=0.009). In the patient group with peri-interventional de-novo AF, only 25.0% (n=13) received long-term oral anticoagulation therapy (OAK). The rate of stroke in patients who received OAK after peri- interventional de-novo AF was 7.7% (n=1) compared to those without OAK 2.6% (n=1). Conclusion Peri-interventional AF is a frequent finding in STEMI patients undergoing primary PCI. Patients with peri-interventional AF had a significantly increased risk for an adverse cardiovascular outcome. Optimal secondary prophylactic measures appear mandatory in this patient population. The significance of long-term OAK therapy is to be determined.