Abstract

Background and Aims: The contradiction of management modality between acute myocardial infarction(AMI) and aortic dissection(AD) may result in clinical catastrophe. Data on risk factors, incidence, and outcome of AD and AMI are limited, and there have been no studies on the long-term outcomes of AMI in patients with AD. So we aimed to investigate long-term outcomes after AMI in patients with AD, and propose a useful diagnostic paradigm.Methods: Consecutively enrolled patients with AD and AMI who were referred to our center from 2010 to 2017. Baseline patient characteristics, risk factors, all medical treatments, echocardiographic parameters, laboratory data, and treatment were recorded. All patients were followed up from the first hospitalization until a first heart event, death, or 17 March, 2018.Results: 0.13% in AMI and 7.49% in AD patients had a concomitant diagnosis of AD and AMI. The average patient age was 53.3 ± 12.1 years and 84.6% were male. The most prevalent vascular risk factors were hypertension (69.2%) and current smoker (64.1%). Of all the 39 patients, 66.7% were managed surgically. Overall in-hospital mortality was 10.3%. The 30-day and 5-year fatality rates were 23.1% and 35.9%, but were higher for female than for male (66.7 vs. 30.3%, log-rank P = 0.045) on 5-year mortality. The overall survival of females was inferior to the males (log-rank P = 0.045).Conclusions: Patients with AMI and AD exhibit high 5-year fatality rates. For these patients, surgical management tends to have lower mortality. Improved management of hypertension and smoking, may reduce future incidence rates.

Highlights

  • Background and AimsThe contradiction of management modality between acute myocardial infarction(AMI) and aortic dissection(AD) may result in clinical catastrophe

  • Data on risk factors, incidence, and outcome of AD and Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) are limited, and there have been no studies on the long-term outcomes of AMI in patients with AD

  • AMI was diagnosed if a patient had a cardiac troponin I level >99th percentile with ≥1 of the following: chest pain lasting >20 min or diagnostic serial electrocardiographic changes consisting of new pathological Q waves, new STsegment-T-wave changes, or new left bundle branch block [18]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Background and AimsThe contradiction of management modality between acute myocardial infarction(AMI) and aortic dissection(AD) may result in clinical catastrophe. Acute myocardial infarction (AMI) and aortic dissection (AD) are both very serious diseases with high rates of morbidity and mortality which have the same manifestations of chest pain. Acute aortic dissection (AAD) is the most common acute aortic condition requiring urgent surgical therapy, [1] with an incidence of about 3 cases in 100,000 per year [2, 3]. Complications such as Outcome of AMI With AD tamponade, aortic valve insufficiency, and malperfusion occur when the aortic side branches are involved [4]. Despite improved surgical techniques and perioperative care, 30-day and 5-year mortality remains high, between 15 and 30% [11, 12]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call