Abstract

The most likely mechanisms of neurologic injury after transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI) and aortic valve replacement (AVR) are cerebral embolization and hypoperfusion. We set out to determine potential mechanisms of neurologic injury after TAVI compared with AVR. One hundred twenty-seven consecutive high-risk patients with severe aortic stenosis (AS) who underwent TAVI (n= 85) or AVR (n= 42) were studied. Transcranial Doppler ultrasound (TCD), cerebral oximetry, diffusion-weighted magnetic resonance imaging (DW-MRI) (before, 6 days, and 3 months after procedure), and neurocognitive assessment before and at 3 months were performed. Neurologic injury was not significantly different between TAVI and AVR at 1 (1.1% vs 2.2%, p= 0.25) and 3 months (4.7% vs 2.2%, p= 1). At 3 months, overall cognitive score was higher in AVR compared with TAVI when adjusted for baseline score; the estimated difference between groups was 0.63 (95% confidence interval 0.87% to 1.17%; p= 0.02). Cerebral embolic load was 212 (123 to 344) during AVR and 134 (76 to 244) during TAVI (p= 0.07). Cerebral oxygen desaturation during AVR (7.56 ± 2.16) was higher compared with TAVI (5.93 ± 2.47) (p < 0.01). Ischemic lesions measured by DW-MRI occurred in 76% of TAVI and 71% of AVR patients at 6 days (p= 0.69) and 63% and 39% at 3 months (p= 0.11). No significant association was found between cerebral emboli, cerebral oxygen desaturation, brain ischemic lesions, and general cognitive score. At 3 months follow-up, overall cognitive score was higher in AVR compared with TAVI, adjusted for baseline score. However, there was no difference in cerebral embolic load, ischemic lesions, and oxygen desaturation.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.