Abstract

ObjectivesThe impact of very low-level viremia (VLLV) and low-level viremia (LLV) are rarely investigated among people living with HIV (PLWH) receiving dolutegravir- vs protease inhibitor (PI)-based antiretroviral therapy (ART). MethodsVirally suppressed PLWH receiving long-term PI-containing ART were included in this study. The incidences of developing VLLV (plasma HIV RNA load (PVL) 20–49 copies/ml), LLV (PVL 50–999 copies/ml), and virological failure (any PVL ≥ 1000 copies/ml) were compared between those switched to dolutegravir-based ART and those remaining on PI-containing ART. ResultsA total of 183 PLWH were switched to dolutegravir-based regimens and 309 remained on PI-containing regimens. The incidences of VLLV and LLV were 26.5 and 13.2 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the dolutegravir group, respectively, and 17.1 and 7.0 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the PI group; there were no statistically significant differences after adjusting for confounders. The rate of virological failure was 1.3 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the dolutegravir group and 1.9 per 100 person-years of follow-up in the PI group (p = 0.32). Neither VLLV nor LLV was related to subsequent virological failure. ConclusionsAmong virally suppressed PLWH, the risk of developing VLLV or LLV were similar between those switched to dolutegravir-based therapy and those who continued PI-based therapy. VLLV and LLV were not associated with subsequent virological failure.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call