Abstract

Store managers in retail firms are often offered a performance-based compensation scheme accompanied with a performance target by the headquarters. The headquarters adjusts the performance target based on store managers’ historical performance and therefore generates the ratchet effect. Consequently, store managers may downward manipulate performance, that is, deflated performance manipulation, so as to weasel out of target growth and smooth performance growth. However, the reputation effect that seeks fame by store managers can restrain deflated performance manipulation. We model a dynamic agency setting in which both the ratchet effect and the reputation effect are related to the store manager’s compensation scheme, and the store manager has to balance her effort and deflated performance manipulation. Our findings reveal that the ratchet effect and environmental volatility jointly determine the existence of deflated performance manipulation, yet the reputation effect can restrain it with increasing environmental volatility. In addition, deflated performance manipulation is inevitable when environmental volatility is large enough, and explicit incentives may promote deflated performance manipulation.

Highlights

  • In retail firms, the headquarters has to motivate and supervise multiple stores

  • Our findings reveal that the ratchet effect and environmental volatility jointly determine the existence of deflated performance manipulation, yet the reputation effect can restrain it with increasing environmental volatility

  • Due to both the ratchet effect and the reputation effect referring to long-term incentive problem, we model a dynamic agency setting to investigate how the store manager balances her effort involvement and deflated performance manipulation, so as to help the headquarters improve the incentive scheme and supervision

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The headquarters has to motivate and supervise multiple stores. In order to enhance the performance per store, the headquarters always offers store managers a performance-based compensation scheme [1]. Given that the ratchet effect and the reputation effect have opposite impacts on store managers, in this paper, we focus on studying how the two effects jointly influence the performance manipulation of the store manager, who is given a performance-based compensation scheme, and the optimal incentive. Due to both the ratchet effect and the reputation effect referring to long-term incentive problem, we model a dynamic agency setting to investigate how the store manager balances her effort involvement and deflated performance manipulation, so as to help the headquarters improve the incentive scheme and supervision.

Literature Review
Model Development
Cross-Sectional Results
Optimal Manipulation Implications
Optimal Effort Implications
Conclusions and Implications
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call