Abstract
This paper assesses the incentive effects of stock options that link vesting to firm performance. It is shown that performance-vested stock options induce higher managerial effort than traditional stock options (i.e. stock options that vest unconditionally) when performance targets are not too difficult. Furthermore, the principal is strictly better off when using performance-vested stock options. When performance targets reside at the optimal level, analysis indicates an above 70% vesting probability, echoing the consensus in the goal-setting literature that states that tight, but achievable targets are associated with performance benefits.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have