Abstract

With the deepening of economic globalization and international division of labor, enterprises gradually turn to supply chain management methods that aiming at win-win cooperation. An enterprise’s corporate social responsibility (CSR) behaviors will affect the interests of other enterprises in the supply chain through transmission, diffusion, amplification, feedback, etc. Therefore, scholars are currently focusing on helping supply chain enterprises to take social responsibility. This paper takes a two-echelon supply chain as an example, which is composed of one manufacturer and one retailer. Considering the influence of lag effect on the performance level of corporate social responsibility, we discuss the optimal strategy of corporate social responsibility in supply chain under centralized and decentralized decision-making. Three incentive models are proposed to improve the implementation effect of decentralized supply chain decision. Study finds that, in real life, decentralized supply chain is more in line with the decision-making mode of supply chain participants, even though centralized decision-making has better operation effect. Under certain circumstances, the mixed contract, which is composed of advertising cooperation, cost sharing and revenue sharing, could lead to supply chain coordination. As an external stakeholder, the government’s subsidy plays a positive role in promoting the fulfillment of corporate social responsibility. Multi-subsidy performs better than single-subsidy. Although the time lag promotes the manufacturer’s social responsibility efforts and the retailer’s advertising, it somehow compromises overall profit of the supply chain. Therefore, manufacturers should try to reduce the lag effect to maintain the overall profitability of the supply chain.

Highlights

  • Since the second half of the 20th century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been a wide concern of governments, international organizations, and the public

  • In order to improve the practice level of social responsibility in the whole supply chain, it is necessary for supply chain enterprises to cooperate with each other to fulfill social responsibility

  • Enterprises should find a coordination point between social responsibility and economic benefits to promote the further development of supply chain corporate social responsibility

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the second half of the 20th century, corporate social responsibility (CSR) has been a wide concern of governments, international organizations, and the public. Based on the above discussion, this paper establishes a two-echelon supply chain composed of one manufacturer and one retailer, and considers the impact of corporate reputation with delay effect on supply chain demand into supply chain decision-making. It dynamically analyzes the level of social responsibility and corporate reputation of the supply chain enterprises, and considers the decision-making of CSR in the supply chain in five scenarios: traditional centralized decision-making; traditional decentralized decision-making; decentralized supply chain internal cooperation decision-making under mixed contract; decentralized supply chain external cooperation decision-making under government subsidy; and decentralized supply chain internal and external cooperation decision-making under mixed-contract government subsidy.

Basic Model
Centralized Supply Chain Decision
Decentralized Supply Chain Decision
The optimal path of supply chain enterprises’ social responsibility level is
Supply Chain Internal Cooperation Incentive
Supply Chain External Cooperation Incentive
Supply Chain Internal and External Cooperation Incentive
Numerical Analysis
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call