Abstract

BackgroundWhile autozygosity as a consequence of selection is well understood, there is limited information on the ability of different methods to measure true inbreeding. In the present study, a gene dropping simulation was performed and inbreeding estimates based on runs of homozygosity (ROH), pedigree, and the genomic relationship matrix were compared to true inbreeding. Inbreeding based on ROH was estimated using SNP1101, PLINK, and BCFtools software with different threshold parameters. The effects of different selection methods on ROH patterns were also compared. Furthermore, inbreeding coefficients were estimated in a sample of genotyped North American Holstein animals born from 1990 to 2016 using 50 k chip data and ROH patterns were assessed before and after genomic selection.ResultsUsing ROH with a minimum window size of 20 to 50 using SNP1101 provided the closest estimates to true inbreeding in simulation study. Pedigree inbreeding tended to underestimate true inbreeding, and results for genomic inbreeding varied depending on assumptions about base allele frequencies. Using an ROH approach also made it possible to assess the effect of population structure and selection on distribution of runs of autozygosity across the genome. In the simulation, the longest individual ROH and the largest average length of ROH were observed when selection was based on best linear unbiased prediction (BLUP), whereas genomic selection showed the largest number of small ROH compared to BLUP estimated breeding values (BLUP-EBV). In North American Holsteins, the average number of ROH segments of 1 Mb or more per individual increased from 57 in 1990 to 82 in 2016. The rate of increase in the last 5 years was almost double that of previous 5 year periods. Genomic selection results in less autozygosity per generation, but more per year given the reduced generation interval.ConclusionsThis study shows that existing software based on the measurement of ROH can accurately identify autozygosity across the genome, provided appropriate threshold parameters are used. Our results show how different selection strategies affect the distribution of ROH, and how the distribution of ROH has changed in the North American dairy cattle population over the last 25 years.

Highlights

  • While autozygosity as a consequence of selection is well understood, there is limited information on the ability of different methods to measure true inbreeding

  • Measures of inbreeding True inbreeding (FTRUE) and inbreeding values based on pedigree (FPED), genomic relationship (FGRM) and runs of homozygosity (ROH) (FROH) were calculated for all animals in simulated populations under four different selection criteria

  • In both tables, only the Inbreeding values based on runs of homozygosity (FROH) based on SNP1101 using a minimum window size of 20 single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP) is presented, which resulted in the closest estimates to true simulated inbreeding

Read more

Summary

Introduction

While autozygosity as a consequence of selection is well understood, there is limited information on the ability of different methods to measure true inbreeding. A gene dropping simulation was performed and inbreeding estimates based on runs of homozygosity (ROH), pedigree, and the genomic relationship matrix were compared to true inbreeding. Inbreeding coefficients were estimated in a sample of genotyped North American Holstein animals born from 1990 to 2016 using 50 k chip data and ROH patterns were assessed before and after genomic selection. Forutan et al BMC Genomics (2018) 19:98 shorter generation interval, as young animals with high GEBV are selected to be parents [3]. Such higher increase could result in lower genetic variation, lower response to selection, and a higher risk of homozygosity for deleterious/ lethal alleles [4]. Using pedigree information for calculating the level of inbreeding usually underestimates the true inbreeding coefficient [6], due to incomplete pedigree information, especially for distant generations

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call