Abstract

Toxicological reviews of data on Aerotoxic Syndrome that have been widely referenced by the airline industry tend to use a toxicological endpoint, Organo-Phosphate Induced Neuropathy (OPIDN), that is acknowledged to be the result of a very high dose of organophosphate exposure. Additionally, the reviews tend to only address one chemical, Tri-Ortho Cresyl Phosphate (TOCP), ignoring the presence of other toxic compounds in a complex mixture. In using this to justify the safety of the continued use of unfiltered engine bleed air to ventilate civil aircraft cabins, this represents a misuse of toxicological risk assessment. The approach totally ignores the scientific literature on repeated low-dose exposure to OPs over extended periods, the constant presence of a complex mixture of OPs in engine bleed air and their overall toxicity and the variable susceptibility of individuals to toxicological damage. This paper lists the above-mentioned studies and reviews a sub-set. We present the scientific literature that should be considered to make a realistic risk assessment of the hazards of aircraft engine bleed air.

Highlights

  • Open Acc J of Toxicol. 4(5): OAJT.MS.ID.555646 (2020)Open Access Journal of Toxicology ”,”non-dropping-particle”:””,”parse-names”:false,”suffix”:””-}],”container-title”:”AerospaceEngineering”,”id”:”ITEM-2 ”,” issued ” : { “ d a te - parts ” : [ [ “ 2 0 1 8 ” ] ] },” p a g e ” : ” 1 -19”,”title”:”Turbine Engine Lubricant and Additive DegradationMechanisms ”,” t y p e ” : ” c h a p te r ” },” u r i s ” : [ “ h t t p : / / w w w.mendeley.com/documents/?uuid=510df 753-5e81-4c9c-96d6-cd7fcb63fe9c”]},{“id”:”ITEM-3”,”itemData”:{“author ”:[{“dropping-particle”:””,”family”:”Mackerer”,”given”:”CarlR”,”non-dropping-particle”:””,”parse-names”:false,”suffix”:””},{“dropping-particle”:””,”family”:”Barth”,”given”:”Mary L”,”nondropping-particle”:””,”parse-names”:false,”suffix”:””},{“drop ping-particle”:””,”family”:”Krueger”,”given”:”Andrew

  • It should be noted that in the hens in this dosage group there was an over 60% inhibition of Neuropathy Target Esterase (NTE), indicating very high dosing

  • Example 3) De Ree [32] take a similar approach. Their 2nd paragraph of Section 4 contains the core of the risk assessment: “Based on the detection limit of ToCP (0.5ng/m3 ) maximum uptake via inhalation with a 100% bioavailability would amount up to 0.02ng/kg body weight per day for a crew member of 70kg Step 1, Figure 2

Read more

Summary

Background

Their 2nd paragraph of Section 4 contains the core of the risk assessment: “Based on the detection limit of ToCP (0.5ng/m3 ) maximum uptake via inhalation with a 100% bioavailability would amount up to 0.02ng/kg body weight per day for a crew member of 70kg Step 1, Figure 2 This level of exposure was compared with the available lowest No-Observed Adverse Effect Level (NOAEL) of ToCP that was established in chickens and amounts to 1.25mg/ kg/ d after a repeated daily oral dose for 90 days Craig & Barth [27]. The paper avoids citing of the latest science on low dose repeat exposure to OPs. the use of OPIDN as the toxicological endpoint represents, at best, a failure of hazard assessment and at worst a complete misunderstanding of the clinical picture presenting in aircrew.

Conclusions
Findings
EASA Research Project
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call