Inappropriate constancy scaling as a factor in the müller‐lyer illusion

Abstract

The inappropriate constancy theory of geometrical illusions assumes the existence of implicit depth cues which automatically set constancy scaling. In the present study the phenomenon of cue conflict has been employed to test for latent depth cues in the Müller-Lyer figures. The technique consisted in introducing a stereoscopic disparity between the figures by means of an aniseikonic lens and measuring the perceived depth between the figures. The magnitude of the stereoscopic effect depends on whether the perspective cues augment or inhibit the stereoscopic depth cues. The results were inconsistent with the misapplied constancy theory, but confirmed Pike & Stacey's (1969) observation that the illusion of size may act as a depth cue.