Abstract
The paper provides systematization of inadmissible refusals in civil law enshrined in civil legislation and clarification of court practice. The author analyzes the reasons for fixing the inadmissibility of refusal through civil law cases, which include situations of protection of the weaker party in civil law relations. A specific characteristic of inadmissible refusals according to the way of their expression is proposed: with the presence or absence of legal consequences of inadmissible refusals. The “doctrine of the nullity of refusal” prevailing in modern Russian science and court practice is criticized as contradicting the fundamental principles of civil law (in particular, the principles of freedom of contract, inadmissibility of arbitrary interference in private affairs, etc.) and generally acceptable type of legal regulation peculiar to civil law. Some ways to overcome it are proposed. It is concluded that the resolution of the issue of recognizing a refusal as valid or invalid should be based on the correct qualification of the relevant norms, which fix certain legal opportunities for participants in civil law relations as imperative or dispositive.
Highlights
The paper provides systematization of inadmissible refusals in civil law enshrined in civil legislation and clarification of court practice
The author analyzes the reasons for fixing the inadmissibility of refusal through civil law cases, which include situations of protection of the weaker party in civil law relations
A specific characteristic of inadmissible refusals according to the way of their expression is proposed: with the presence or absence of legal consequences of inadmissible refusals
Summary
Что разрешение вопроса о признании отказа в качестве действительного или недействительного должно основываться на правильной квалификации соответствующих норм, закрепляющих определенные правовые возможности для участников гражданско-правовых отношений, в качестве императивных или диспозитивных. Ничтожность соглашения об отказе от личных неимущественных прав автора поясняется тем, что «...все физические и юридические лица, а также само государство должны воздерживаться от посягательств (нарушений) на личные неимущественные права граждан»9, их непередаваемостью и неотчуждаемостью[10]; ничтожность отказов от прав лица, которому выдана доверенность, и прав лица, выдавшего доверенность, на отказ от полномочий, отмену доверенности или передоверие во всякое время — конституирующим значением для доверенности[11]; невозможность отказа от права составить завещание, отменить или изменить его — личным характером завещательных распоряжений[12].
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.