Abstract

Current heart valve prostheses have limitations that include durability, inability to grow in pediatric patients, and lifelong anticoagulation. Transcatheter aortic valve replacements are minimally invasive procedures, and therefore have emerged as an alternative to traditional valve prostheses. In this experiment, the regenerative capacity of potential tissue engineered transcatheter valve scaffolds (1) acellular porcine pericardium and (2) mesenchymal stem cell-seeded acellular porcine pericardium were compared to native porcine aortic valve cusps in a rat subcutaneous model for up to 8 weeks. Immunohistochemistry, extracellular matrix evaluation, and tissue biomechanics were evaluated on the explanted tissue. Acellular valve scaffolds expressed CD163, CD31, alpha smooth muscle actin, and vimentin at each time point indicating host cell recellularization; however, MSC-seeded tissue showed greater recellularization. Inflammatory cells were observed with CD3 biomarker in native porcine pericardial tissue throughout the study. No inflammation was observed in either acellular or MSC-seeded scaffolds. There was no mechanical advantage observed in MSC-seeded tissue; however after the first week post-explant, there was a decrease in mechanical properties in all groups (p < 0.05). MSC-seeded and acellular porcine pericardium expressed decreased inflammatory response and better host-cell recellularization compared to the native porcine aortic valve cusps.

Highlights

  • Utilizing acellular pericardial tissue that showed superior mechanical behavior compared to native valve cusps[19]

  • The current study evaluated the in vivo behavior of acellular porcine pericardium, mesenchymal stem cells (MSCs)-seeded porcine pericardium, and native porcine aortic valve cusps in an in vivo model

  • After 1 week, the acellular porcine pericardium was adhered to the adjoining muscle; after 8 weeks, tissue was separated by the host tissue

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Utilizing acellular pericardial tissue that showed superior mechanical behavior compared to native valve cusps[19]. We have shown that our decellularization and sterilization process produced a stronger and more resilient tissue[20]. This processed tissue was able to recellularize with host cells after 5-months implantation in an ovine model[18]. The current study evaluated the in vivo behavior of acellular porcine pericardium, MSC-seeded porcine pericardium, and native porcine aortic valve cusps in an in vivo model. We hypothesized that acellular and MSC-seeded porcine pericardium has better regenerative capacity with minimal inflammation compared to native porcine aortic valve cusps

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call