Abstract

BackgroundThe spine has a complex motor control. Its different stabilization mechanisms through passive, active, and neurological subsystems may result in spinal stiffness. To better understand lumbar spinal motor control, this study aimed to measure the effects of increasing the axial load on spinal stiffness.MethodsA total of 19 healthy young participants (mean age, 24 ± 2.1 years; 8 males and 11 females) were assessed in an upright standing position. Under different axial loads, the posterior-to-anterior spinal stiffness of the thoracic and lumbar spine was measured. Loads were 0%, 10%, 45%, and 80% of the participant’s body weight.ResultsData were normally distributed and showed excellent reliability. A repeated-measures analysis of variance with a Greenhouse–Geisser correction showed an effect of the loading condition on the mean spinal stiffness [F (2.6, 744) = 3.456, p < 0.001]. Vertebrae and loading had no interaction [F (2.6, 741) = 0.656, p = 0.559]. Post hoc tests using Bonferroni correction revealed no changes with 10% loading (p = 1.000), and with every additional step of loading, spinal stiffness decreased: 0% or 10–45% loading (p < 0.001), 0% or 10–80% loading (p < 0.001), and 45–80% (p < 0.001).ConclusionWe conclude that a load of ≥ 45% of the participant’s body weight can lead to changes in the spinal motor control. An axial load of 10% showed no significant changes. Rehabilitation should include high-axial-load exercise if needed in everyday living.

Highlights

  • A well-working spinal motor control system is needed to protect the human spine from injury and to prevent low back pain

  • The sample size was determined based on a previous study that measured lumbar and thoracic spinal stiffness with and without an additional axial load of 50% of the participant’s body weight (Hausler et al 2020)

  • A repeatedmeasures analysis of variance (ANOVA) with a Greenhouse–Geisser correction showed a significant effect of loading condition on mean spinal stiffness [F (2.6, 744) = 3.456, p < 0.021]

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A well-working spinal motor control system is needed to protect the human spine from injury and to prevent low back pain (van Dieen et al 2019; Shumway-Cook and Woollacott 2012) During both static and dynamic movements, different. European Journal of Applied Physiology (2021) 121:2277–2283 include muscle activity or motor control of the spine (Stokes and Gardner-Morse 2003; Gardner-Morse and Stokes 2003; Zhang et al 2020). Both the active and passive subsystems can be assessed by measuring spinal stiffness (Hausler et al 2020; Swanenburg et al 2018, 2020). Rehabilitation should include high-axial-load exercise if needed in everyday living

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call