Abstract
Large marginal crown discrepancies are deleterious. Although previous studies have examined casting seating in vitro, few have evaluated the effects of different luting cements on in vivo seating. Hence this in vivo study compared marginal discrepancies created by different cements on cast crowns. Tooth preparations were completed according to acceptable procedures on previously intact human molars that were severely periodontally compromised and scheduled for extraction. Castings were made by conventional techniques. The castings were randomly assigned to the following luting agents: zinc phosphate cement, resin-modified glass-ionomer cement, and the same resin-modified glass-ionomer cement with a dentinal bonding agent. After 6 months the teeth were carefully extracted, embedded, and sectioned, and vertical and horizontal discrepancies were measured. Analysis of variance revealed that all cements resulted in similar discrepancies. Vertical discrepancies were considerably greater than horizontal discrepancies, and the distributions of marginal discrepancies were skewed towards upper ranges.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
