Abstract

BackgroundThe purpose of this study was to clarify the in vivo kinematics of a newly updated posterior-stabilised (PS) mobile-bearing total knee arthroplasty during high-flexion activities in weight-bearing (WB) and non-weight-bearing (NWB) conditions. The hypothesis was that the kinematics would differ between the WB and NWB conditions, and the kinematics would be affected by the WB condition. MethodsThe kinematics of 19 knees were investigated under fluoroscopy during squatting (WB) and active-assisted knee flexion (NWB) with two- and three-dimensional registration technique. Accordingly, the range of motion, anteroposterior (AP) translation of the medial and lateral contact points, axial rotation of the femoral component relative to the tibial component, and kinematic pathway were evaluated. ResultsThere was no difference in the knee’s range of motion between the WB and NWB conditions. The medial AP translation of the femur did not differ in each flexion angle between WB and NWB conditions except for flexions of 70°. There was no difference in the lateral AP translation of the femur at all tested flexion angles between the WB and NWB conditions. The external femoral rotation and the medial pivot motion were observed throughout all flexion angles in WB conditions. The clinical relevance is that this implant could produce ideal medial AP stability and medial pivot motion. ConclusionThe medial AP translation of the femur was stable for AP direction when it was in both WB and NWB conditions. In WB conditions, the medial pivot motion was observed throughout all flexion angles.Level of Evidence: III.

Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call