Abstract

Pulse oximeters rely on the technique of photoplethysmography (PPG) to estimate arterial oxygen saturation (SpO_2). In conditions of poor peripheral perfusion such as hypotension, hypothermia, and vasoconstriction, the PPG signals detected are often weak and noisy, or in some cases unobtainable. Hence, pulse oximeters produce erroneous SpO_2 readings in these circumstances. The problem arises as most commercial pulse oximeter probes are designed to be attached to peripheral sites such as the finger or toe, which are easily affected by vasoconstriction. In order to overcome this problem, the ear canal was investigated as an alternative site for measuring reliable SpO_2 on the hypothesis that blood flow to this central site is preferentially preserved. A novel miniature ear canal PPG sensor was developed along with a state of the art PPG processing unit to investigate PPG measurements from the bottom surface of the ear canal. An in vivo study was carried out in 15 healthy volunteers to validate the developed technology. In this comparative study, red and infrared PPGs were acquired from the ear canal and the finger of the volunteers, whilst they were undergoing artificially induced hypothermia by means of cold exposure (10 ^circC). Normalised Pulse Amplitude (NPA) and SpO_2 was calculated from the PPG signals acquired from the ear canal and the finger. Good quality baseline PPG signals with high signal-to-noise ratio were obtained from both the PPG sensors. During cold exposure, significant differences were observed in the NPA of the finger PPGs. The mean NPA of the red and infrared PPGs from the finger have dropped by >80%. Contrary to the finger, the mean NPA of red and infrared ear canal PPGs had dropped only by 0.2 and 13% respectively. The SpO_2s estimated from the finger sensor have dropped below 90% in five volunteers (failure) by the end of the cold exposure. The ear canal sensor, on the other hand, had only failed in one volunteer. These results strongly suggest that the ear canal may be used as a suitable alternative site for monitoring PPGs and arterial blood oxygen saturation at times were peripheral perfusion is compromised.

Highlights

  • A pulse oximeter is a non-invasive optical device used to provide a continuous and robust measure of arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2)

  • Two key observations can be made from the figure—(1) the pronounced respiratory modulation in the ear canal PPG signals when compared to the finger PPGs, and (2) the large DC amplitude and small AC amplitude of the ear canal PPG signals when compared to the PPG signals acquired from the periphery

  • It is evident that the power of the respiration related frequency component is much higher in the ear canal PPG signals than that of the periphery

Read more

Summary

Introduction

A pulse oximeter is a non-invasive optical device used to provide a continuous and robust measure of arterial oxygen saturation (SpO2). The device measures SpO2 by shining light at two different wavelengths into the vascular tissue (such as the finger or the ear lobe) and sensing the changes in light absorption of the oxygenated and deoxygenated haemoglobin produced during arterial pulsations [1]. The device has since its invention in the 1970s revolutionised anaesthesia and critical care. The popularity of the device and its increased clinical use in recent years has driven the manufacturers and researchers to consistently develop its hardware, software and signal processing algorithms. The most important limitation of the device in its current state is the inability to estimate accurate SpO2 in conditions of poor peripheral perfusion

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call