Abstract

The hippocampus consists of anatomically and functionally distinct subfields that may be differentially involved in the pathophysiology of bipolar disorder (BD). Here we, the Enhancing NeuroImaging Genetics through Meta‐Analysis Bipolar Disorder workinggroup, study hippocampal subfield volumetry in BD. T1‐weighted magnetic resonance imaging scans from 4,698 individuals (BD = 1,472, healthy controls [HC] = 3,226) from 23 sites worldwide were processed with FreeSurfer. We used linear mixed‐effects models and mega‐analysis to investigate differences in hippocampal subfield volumes between BD and HC, followed by analyses of clinical characteristics and medication use. BD showed significantly smaller volumes of the whole hippocampus (Cohen's d = −0.20), cornu ammonis (CA)1 (d = −0.18), CA2/3 (d = −0.11), CA4 (d = −0.19), molecular layer (d = −0.21), granule cell layer of dentate gyrus (d = −0.21), hippocampal tail (d = −0.10), subiculum (d = −0.15), presubiculum (d = −0.18), and hippocampal amygdala transition area (d = −0.17) compared to HC. Lithium users did not show volume differences compared to HC, while non‐users did. Antipsychotics or antiepileptic use was associated with smaller volumes. In this largest study of hippocampal subfields in BD to date, we show widespread reductions in nine of 12 subfields studied. The associations were modulated by medication use and specifically the lack of differences between lithium users and HC supports a possible protective role of lithium in BD.

Highlights

  • Bipolar disorders (BD) affect over 1% of the population worldwide (Grande, Berk, Birmaher, & Vieta, 2016)

  • This largest study of hippocampal subfield volumes in BD to date, had five key findings: (a) individuals with BD had smaller volumes across most subfields compared to healthy controls (HC), (b) individuals with the BD1 subtype showed largest effect sizes when compared to HC, (c) volumes in lithium users did not differ from HC, (d) antipsychotics and antiepileptics users showed smaller volumes compared to non-users, and (e) altered volumes were not associated with other clinical characteristics

  • By pooling data sets to include over 4,600 participants, these results confirm and extend our current knowledge of hippocampal structure in BD

Read more

Summary

| INTRODUCTION

Bipolar disorders (BD) affect over 1% of the population worldwide (Grande, Berk, Birmaher, & Vieta, 2016). By combining cyto- and chemo-architectural features with macroscopic landmarks, segmentation of the hippocampal subfields from MR-images has improved, and high-resolution ex-vivo data have been used to develop detailed hippocampal subfield atlases (Iglesias et al, 2015), which have proven stable across scanners and time points (Brown et al, 2020) Despite such advances and the refinement of automated segmentation protocols (Iglesias et al, 2015; Pipitone et al, 2014; Yushkevich et al, 2010; Yushkevich et al, 2015) it remains challenging to reproduce findings across studies (Haukvik et al, 2018). Determining the specific pattern of subfield volume reduction in BD may provide further insights into the pathophysiological mechanisms of the disorder

| METHODS AND MATERIALS
| RESULTS
Findings
| DISCUSSION
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call