In vivo evaluation of whitening toothpaste efficiency and patient treatment satisfaction: a randomized controlled trial.

Abstract

To assess the whitening efficiency and patient satisfaction after usage of commercially available toothpastes with the different whitening ingredients. This randomized controlled trial study comprised 161 participants who were randomly divided into eight groups based on used whitening or control/conventional toothpaste (Colgate Max Expert White [CMEW], n = 20; Signal Daily White [SDW], n = 20; Himalaya Sparkly White Herbalis [HSWH], n = 20; Signal White System [SWS], n = 20; Rembrandt Deeply White + Peroxide [RDWP], n = 20; Splat Extreme White [SEW], n = 20; Splat White Plus [SWP], n = 21; and Kalodont Multi Repair [control], n = 20). Tooth color and color change were evaluated using a spectrophotometer (CIELAB coordinates, ΔEab*, ΔE00, whiteness index change [ΔWID]). Measurements were performed at baseline, 30days and 60days after the beginning of treatment, and 30days after completing treatment - follow-up. Side effects and satisfaction with the whitening outcome were reported throughout the questionnaire. The results for ΔL*, Δa*, and Δb* showed an increase in lightness and decrease in yellowness for all tested whitening toothpastes compared to the control group after 30days of use (p ≤ 0.05). Also, significant tooth color difference (ΔEab*, ΔE00) and whiteness index change (ΔWID) were recorded for all tested whitening toothpastes 30days and 60days from the beginning of use (p ≤ 0.05). Toothpaste containing a combination of urea peroxide and enzyme ingredients (SEW) demonstrated the highest and the longest whitening effect. Whitening toothpastes can show perceptibly whitening effect after a short time of usage, but without a long-lasting impact. Toothpaste containing a combination of enzymes and peroxides showed the best whitening performance compared to those containing only enzymes, peroxides, or abrasives. ClinicalTrials.gov: NCT04460755.