Abstract
PurposeThe purpose of this study was to evaluate the ability to depict in vivo bone vascularization using ultra-high-resolution (UHR) computed tomography (CT) with deep learning reconstruction (DLR) and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm, compared to simulated conventional CT, using osteoid osteoma as a model. Materials and methodsPatients with histopathologically proven cortical osteoid osteoma who underwent UHR-CT between October 2019 and October 2022 were retrospectively included. Images were acquired with a 1024 × 1024 matrix and reconstructed with DLR and hybrid iterative reconstruction algorithm. To simulate conventional CT, images with a 512 × 512 matrix were also reconstructed. Two radiologists (R1, R2) independently evaluated the number of blood vessels entering the nidus and crossing the bone cortex, as well as vessel identification and image quality with a 5-point scale. Standard deviation (SD) of attenuation in the adjacent muscle and that of air were used as image noise and recorded. ResultsThirteen patients with 13 osteoid osteomas were included. There were 11 men and two women with a mean age of 21.8 ± 9.1 (SD) years. For both readers, UHR-CT with DLR depicted more nidus vessels (11.5 ± 4.3 [SD] (R1) and 11.9 ± 4.6 [SD] (R2)) and cortical vessels (4 ± 3.8 [SD] and 4.3 ± 4.1 [SD], respectively) than UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction (10.5 ± 4.3 [SD] and 10.4 ± 4.6 [SD], and 4.1 ± 3.8 [SD] and 4.3 ± 3.8 [SD], respectively) and simulated conventional CT (5.3 ± 2.2 [SD] and 6.4 ± 2.5 [SD], 2 ± 1.2 [SD] and 2.4 ± 1.6 [SD], respectively) (P < 0.05). UHR-CT with DLR provided less image noise than simulated conventional CT and UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction (P < 0.05). UHR-CT with DLR received the greatest score and simulated conventional CT the lowest score for vessel identification and image quality. ConclusionUHR-CT with DLR shows less noise than UHR-CT with hybrid iterative reconstruction and significantly improves cortical bone vascularization depiction compared to simulated conventional CT.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Similar Papers
More From: Diagnostic and Interventional Imaging
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.