In vivo approach on femur bone regeneration of white rat (Rattus norvegicus) with the use of hydroxyapatite from cuttlefish bone (Sepia spp.) as bone filler.

Aminatun Aminatun,D.E Fadhilah Handayani,Siswanto Siswanto,Dwi Winarni,Prihartini Widiyanti

doi:10.14202/vetworld.2019.809-816

Aminatun Aminatun, D.E Fadhilah Handayani + Show 3 more

Open Access

https://doi.org/10.14202/vetworld.2019.809-816

Copy DOI

Journal: Veterinary world	Publication Date: Jun 1, 2019
Citations: 2	License type: CC BY 4.0

Affiliation: Airlangga University

Abstract

Background:Hydroxyapatite (HA) from bovine bone has been widely used as bone filler in many fractures cases. HA can also be made from cuttlefish bone (Sepia spp.) that has abundant availability in Indonesia and contains 84% CaCO3, which is a basic ingredient of HA. However, research on the effects of HA from cuttlefish bone on bone regeneration parameters has not been done yet.Aim:This study aimed to determine femur bone regeneration of white rats (Rattus norvegicus) through the use of HA from cuttlefish bone (Sepia spp.) as bone filler.Materials and Methods:HA was made using the hydrothermal method by mixing 1M aragonite (CaCO3) from cuttlefish bone and 0.6 M NH4H2PO4 at 200°C for 12 h followed by sintering at 900°C for 1 h. In vivo test was carried out in three groups, including control group, bovine bone-derived HA group, and cuttlefish bone-derived HA group. The generation of femur bone was observed through the number of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, woven bone, lamellar bone, havers system, and repair bone through anatomical pathology test for 28 days and 56 days.Results:Anatomical pathology test results are showed that administration of bovine bone-derived HA and cuttlefish bone-derived HA increased the number of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, woven bone, lamellar bone, havers system, and bone repair at recuperation of 56 days. Statistical test using Statistical Package for the Social Sciences with Kruskal–Wallis and Mann–Whitney U-test was resulted in significant differences between the bovine bone-derived HA control group and the cuttlefish-derived HA control group. There was no significant difference toward the indication of bone formation through the growth of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, woven bone, lamellar bone, havers system, and bone repair in the bovine bone-derived HA and cuttlefish bone-derived HA groups.Conclusion:It can be concluded that cuttlefish bone-derived HA has the potential as bone filler based on the characteristics of bone regeneration through in vivo test.

Highlights

Fractures are commonly caused by injury, accident, mechanical impact, or osteoporosis [1], which result in bone regeneration
Anatomical pathology test results are showed that administration of bovine bone-derived HA and cuttlefish bone-derived HA increased the number of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, woven bone, lamellar bone, havers system, and bone repair at recuperation of 56 days
There was no significant difference toward the indication of bone formation through the growth of osteoblasts, osteoclasts, woven bone, lamellar bone, havers system, and bone repair in the bovine bonederived HA and cuttlefish bone-derived HA groups

Summary

Introduction

Fractures are commonly caused by injury, accident, mechanical impact, or osteoporosis [1], which result in bone regeneration. One method in handling functional damages and that can accelerate the process of bone regeneration is biomaterial implantation. This type of method that has been widely used is through bone substitution. The use of implanted bone substitution must be biocompatible to the surrounding tissues, non-toxic, and bioactive [2]. Research on the effects of HA from cuttlefish bone on bone regeneration parameters has not been done yet

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion