Abstract

The reduction of sulfur dioxide in wine is a consumer’s demand, considering the allergic effects that may occur in people who are sensitive to it. Stilbenes are candidates of great interest for this purpose because of their antioxidant/antimicrobial activities and health properties, and also because they are naturally found in the grapevine. In the present study, the in vitro toxicity of an extract from grapevine shoots (with a stilbene richness of 45.4%) was assessed in two human cell lines. Significant damage was observed from 30 μg/mL after 24 h, and 40 µg/mL after 48 h of exposure. Similarly, the ultrastructural study revealed a significant impairment of cell growing. The extract was able to protect cells against an induced oxidative stress at all concentrations studied. In view of the promising results, a more exhaustive toxicological assessment of the extract is needed to confirm the safety of its further use as additive in wine.

Highlights

  • The most widely used preservative in the wine industry is sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) so far

  • The present work entail the first approach to the toxicological studies required before being used in wines

  • The cytotoxicity study evidenced that the stilbene extract reduced cell viability in both cell lines in the range of concentrations from 40–100 μg/mL after 24 h of exposure and from 30–100 μg/mL at 48 h of exposure

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The most widely used preservative in the wine industry is sulfur dioxide (SO2 ) so far. The exposure to SO2 may have health side effects such as dermatitis, urticarial, angioedema, diarrhea, abdominal pain, bronchoconstriction, and anaphylaxis [1]. The International Organization of Vine and Wine (OIV), in agreement with previous European Commission regulations (Ruling no 606/2009) [2], recommended that the total SO2 content should not exceed 150 mg/L in red wines and 200 mg/L in white and rosé organic/conventional wines [3]. In this regard, the wine industry is developing strategies to reduce and/or replace SO2. None of them have proven to be as effective as Antioxidants 2019, 8, 467; doi:10.3390/antiox8100467 www.mdpi.com/journal/antioxidants

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.