Abstract
The study aimed to determine the base/restoration combination which allowed the least microleakage in Class II cavities. One hundred premolar teeth were prepared with a standardized, minimal two-surface cavity and randomly ascribed to ten equal groups. The cavities were restored by use of one of ten different material/technique combinations. Restored teeth were sealed to within 1 mm of the restoration margins with nail varnish prior to the immersion of the crowns in 5% (buffered) eosin for 48 h. The teeth were then hemisected longitudinally, in a mesio-distal plane, through the midline of the restoration by means of a diamond disc with water coolant, and one half of each tooth was then photographed. The transparencies were examined by image analysis programmed to facilitate calculation of the percentage of the tooth/restoration interface and of the crown dentin exhibiting dye penetration. Light- and chemically-cured glass-ionomer-based restorations showed similar amounts of leakage when expressed as a percentage area of crown dentin. This was significantly (p<0.05) less than that shown by cavities both etched and bonded. Cavities restored without enamel etching or involving the use of a bonding system exhibited significantly (p<0.05) greatest leakage.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
