Abstract

Fifty sound premolar teeth, extracted for orthodontic purposes and stored at room temperature in physiological saline since extraction, were prepared with a standardized minimal two-surface Class II cavity. The teeth were then ascribed randomly to five groups, each of ten teeth. Each of four groups was restored using a different dentine bonding system and the associated posterior composite resin according to the manufacturer's instructions. The fifth group was restored with Superbond C & B dentine bonding system and Occlusin composite. After immersion in de-ionized water for at least 7 days, the teeth were sealed with nail varnish to within 1 mm of the margin of the restoration. The teeth were then immersed in 5 per cent buffered Eosin for 48 h. Following mesiodistal sectioning the sections were photographed and subjected to image analysis to establish the length of dye penetration at the tooth/restoration interface and the amount of dye penetration into the crown dentine. Tripton/Occlusin and XR Bond/Herculite XR groups showed a significantly (P less than 0.05) smaller amount of leakage than Gluma/Lumifor or Scotchbond 2/P50 combinations when assessed as a percentage of the tooth/restoration interface exhibiting leakage. When the percentage of crown dentine showing dye penetration was considered, the Tripton/Occlusin group showed less leakage than the other material combinations. It is concluded that Tripton, when used with the recommended composite, will allow significantly less microleakage than Gluma/Lumifor, Scotchbond 2/P50 or Superbond C & B/Occlusin combinations and a similar amount to XR Bond/Herculite XR in vitro.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call