Abstract
Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) threaten the economic sustainability of viticulture, causing reductions of yield and quality of grapes. Biological control is a promising sustainable alternative to cultural and chemical methods to mitigate the effects of pathogens causing GTDs, including Botryosphaeria dieback, Eutypa dieback and Esca. This study aimed to identify naturally occurring potential biological control agents from grapevine sap, cane and pith tissues, and evaluate their in vitro antagonistic activity against selected fungal GTD pathogens. Bacterial and fungal isolates were preliminarily screened in dual culture assays to determine their antifungal activity against Neofusicoccum parvum and Eutypa lata. Among the fungal isolates, Trichoderma spp. inhibited mycelium growth of E. lata by up to 64% and of N. parvum by up to 73%, with overgrowth and growth cessation being the likely antagonistic mechanisms. Among the bacterial isolates, Bacillus spp. inhibited mycelium growth of E. lata by up to 20% and of N. parvum by up to 40%. Selected antagonistic isolates of Trichoderma, Bacillus and Aureobasidium spp. were subjected to further dual culture antifungal analyses against Diplodia seriata and Diaporthe ampelina, with Trichoderma isolates consistently causing the greatest inhibition. Volatile organic compound antifungal analyses showed that these Trichoderma isolates inhibited mycelium growth of N. parvum (20% inhibition), E. lata (61% inhibition) and Dia. ampelina (71% inhibition). Multilocus sequence analyses revealed that the Trichoderma isolates were most closely related to Trichoderma asperellum and Trichoderma hamatum. This study had identified grapevine sap as a novel source of potential biological control agents for control of GTDs. Further testing will be necessary to fully characterize modes of antagonism of these microorganisms, and assess their efficacy for pruning wound protection in planta.
Highlights
Fungal diseases are major biotic threats to future economic sustainability of table and wine grape production
For collection of sap Grapevine endophytes, epiphytes and sap micro-organisms to control Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) pathogens exudate, the cut points of 1-year-old lignified spurs were sprayed with 70% ethanol for surface sterilization to avoid contamination, and once dry, a horizontal pruning cut was made in each spur with sterile pruning shears
Preliminary screening, dual culture assays with Neofusicoccum parvum and Eutypa lata
Summary
Fungal diseases are major biotic threats to future economic sustainability of table and wine grape production. Grapevine trunk diseases (GTDs) are prevalent in most viticulture regions causing significant yield and quality. GTDs lead to premature decline and dieback of grapevines and are caused by complexes of several taxonomically unrelated Ascomycetes. 2011; Pitt et al, 2013; Rolshausen et al, 2013; Pitt et al, 2015; Yang et al, 2017) Another severe GTD is Eutypa dieback, caused by 24 species of Diatrypaceae, with the most virulent and common being Eutypa lata (Trouillas et al, 2010; Pitt et al, 2013; Luque et al, 2014; Rolshausen et al, 2014). Esca and Phomopsis dieback comprise the GTD complex, and are of worldwide economic importance (Munkvold et al, 1994). GTDs can be found in dormant wood cuttings and young grafted plants, and spread to grapevines during plant propagation processes (Waite and Morton, 2007; Aroca et al, 2010; Gramaje and Armengol, 2011; Billones-Baaijens et al, 2013)
Sign-in/Register to view highlights & summary Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
