Abstract

This study was designed to compare the efficacy of the erbium:yttrium-scandium-gallium-garnet (Er:YSGG) laser and the holmium:yttrium-aluminum-garnet (Ho:YAG) lasers in debriding calcium from freshly explanted aortic valve leaflets and to compare the Er:YSGG laser with the Cavitron ultrasonic surgical aspirator (CUSA). Aortic valve leaflets were freshly explanted from patients undergoing aortic valve replacement for aortic stenosis. Initially, 4 leaflets each were debrided with the Er:YSGG and the Ho:YAG lasers to attempt removal of calcium deposits while preserving the underlying integrity of the leaflets and minimizing thermal damage. The Er:YSGG laser was more effective in doing so with less thermal and photoacoustic damage when compared with the Ho:YAG laser. Twelve more leaflets each were then debrided with the Er:YSGG laser and the CUSA. The Er:YSGG laser again proved less injurious to the underlying leaflet. The CUSA-treated leaflets demonstrated shattering and disruption of adjacent tissue as well as collagen fiber exposure. These changes were not seen with the Er:YSGG laser. Because of these properties, the Er:YSGG laser merits further evaluation as a tool for aortic valvuloplasty procedures in selected patients with senescent calcific aortic stenosis.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.