In-vitro comparison of mechanical resistance between two straight plates and a Y-plate for fixation of mandibular condyle fractures

Abstract

ObjectiveTo compare the mechanical resistance of conventional plates with a modified Y-plate in mandibular condyle fracture. Materials and methods40 synthetic hemi-mandibular polyurethane replicates were used. Two groups of fixing materials were included: 20 mandibles fixed with 40 straight plates with four roles each (2.0 mm system) and 20 mandibles fixed with 20 Y-shaped plates (2.0 mm system and 1.5 mm thickness). The samples were submitted to linear loading in the following directions: 10 mandibles from each group from lateral to medial and 10 mandibles from each group from anterior to posterior. A universal loading machine, Instron Universal 4411, was used to performed the tests, and the resistance of each fixed mandible was assessed at displacements of 1 mm, 3 mm, and 5 mm. The t-test for independent samples was performed. The p value was set at <0.05. ResultsThe worst mechanical resistance was found in the Y-plates loaded from anterior to posterior. The best mechanical resistance was in two straight hole plates loaded from lateral to medial. The Y-plates and two straight hole plates showed similar resistance when a lateral to medial load was applied. ConclusionThere was no difference between the plates when lateral to medial loading was tested.