In Vitro Bonding Performance of Modern Self-Adhesive Resin Cements and Conventional Resin-Modified Glass Ionomer Cements to Prosthetic Substrates

Encarna Piquer Maño,Salvatore Sauro,Amr Fawzy,Victor Feitosa,Rafael Marco Algarra,Fabrício M Collares,Vicente C B Leitune

doi:10.3390/app10228157

Abstract

This study aimed at evaluating the shear bond strength (SBS) of modern self-adhesive resin cements and resin-modified glass ionomer cements applied to different prosthetic substrates. Zirconia, lithium-disilicate glass-ceramic and a noble metal alloy were used as bonding substrates. They were all sand-blasted with alumina, while LD was further etched with 9.6% hydrofluoric acid (10 s). A light-curing resin-modified glass ionomer cement (3M-GIC: Ketac Cem Plus) and a self-curing resin-modified glass ionomer cement (GC-GIC: FujiCEM 2) were compared to self-adhesive resin cements (PAN: Panavia SA Universal) and (3M-RES: Rely X Unicem 2). Ten specimens for each substrate were produced and up to five cylinders of each cement were bonded to each substrate. The shear bond strength (SBS) was evaluated after 24 h or after thermocycling (TC) aging (5000 cycles). The data was statistically analysed by two-way ANOVA and Student–Newman–Keuls test (α = 0.05). Failure modes were analysed through stereoscopic microscopy. The greatest SBS was attained with PAN, whilst 3M-GIC showed the lowest SBS and failed prevalently in adhesive mode. No difference in SBS was observed between GC-GIC and 3M-RES. After TC aging, all cements showed significant drop (p < 0.05) in SBS, but PAN showed the greatest SBS. Reliable bond strength to prosthetic substrates can be achieved with specific universal resin-luting cements and may be an alternative to glass ionomer cements when luting alloy substrates.

Highlights

Nowadays, a great assortment of prosthetic materials is available on the market such as silica-based ceramics and polycrystalline silica-free ceramics
Self-adhesive resin cements are advocated for direct bonding on substrates, as the retention is provided by specific adhesive functional monomers (i.e., 10-MDP) and/or silanes contained within the formulation of such materials [3]
The baseline (24 h) results showed that the greatest bond strength (p < 0.05) in KAT zirconia was attained when using the universal self-adhesive resin luting cement PAN (20.3 MPa), whilst the resin-modified glass ionomer cements (RMGICs) luting cement 3M-GIC showed the lowest

Summary

Introduction

A great assortment of prosthetic materials is available on the market such as silica-based ceramics (e.g., feldspathic, leucite-reinforced and lithium disilicate ceramics) and polycrystalline silica-free ceramics (e.g., zirconia and alumina). Permanent or “definitive” luting cements include those materials characterised by adhesive properties to different dental and/or prosthetic substrates This latter class of materials can be classified into low (zinc phosphate and silicate cements), medium (polycarboxylate cement) or high (glass ionomer and resin cements) strength luting materials. Self-adhesive resin cements are advocated for direct bonding on substrates, as the retention is provided by specific adhesive functional monomers (i.e., 10-MDP) and/or silanes contained within the formulation of such materials [3]. They represent the most innovative simplified class of resin cements, which rapidly reached a great popularity due to their user-friendly clinical uses

Objectives

Methods

Results

Discussion

Conclusion