In vitro bond strength of an epoxy resin-based root canal sealer to root dentin irradiated with high-power lasers and adhesive interface analyses.

Abstract

The aim of this study was to evaluate in vitro the influence of high-power lasers (Nd:YAG and diode 980nm) associated with mineral coal as fotopotencializer on bond strength of an epoxy resin-based root canal sealer to root dentin, using the pushout test, and on the dentin/filling material interface, using confocal laser microscopy. For this purposes, 50 canines were instrumented with Mtwo rotary system up to #50.04 instrument and randomly assigned to five groups (n=10): group I-control EDTAC; group II-EDTAC and Nd:YAG laser; group III-EDTAC and diode laser 980nm; group IV-EDTAC, Nd:YAG laser and mineral coal 5g/100mL; and group V-EDTAC, diode laser 980nm and mineral coal 5g/100mL. All data were analyzed by ANOVA (at 5% significance level) following the Kruskal-Wallis, Dunn and Tukey tests. The group I increased more bond strength of the sealer to root dentin that treated with only EDTAC 17% (17.21±21.75MPa), similar to the group II (12.21±18.20MPa) and group IV (14.92±28.06MPa), both treated with Nd:YAG laser, with the exception of group IV, which was added to mineral coal. The group V (8.75±13.42MPa) had similar results to the groups II and IV, but the same similarity were found when compared with group III (7.11+11.28MPa), with lower results. Regarding the root thirds, the apical third (23.27±29.21MPa) presented a statistically higher value on bond strength than the cervical third (5.92±5.33MPa) and middle third (6.93±7, 11MPa) (p>0.05). Group II (86.27μm) showed the highest tags penetration values, with a statistically difference to the group III (51.57μm), IV (36.77μm) and V (32.37μm) (p<0.05). Group I (71.63μm) was statistically similar to groups II and III (p>0.05). Group IV had the lowest values and was statistically similarity to groups III and V (p>0.05). It was concluded that the treatment with Nd:YAG laser provides better results than the diode 980nm laser, except when was added mineral coal. The control and diode 980nm laser groups presented less adhesive failures and more mists failures than the other groups. Both lasers did not interfere negatively compared to the control group.