Abstract

To evaluate the magnetic resonance (MR) imaging artifacts from several commercially available MR imaging-compatible and non-MR imaging-compatible markers for image-guided marking of soft tissue lesions at different field strengths and sequences. Ten different marking devices (anchor, coil, V, and X shapes) were injected into solid agar and imaged at two different field strengths (1.5 T, 3.0 T) and with three MR sequences (T1-weighted three-dimensional fast low-angle shot, T1-weighted two-dimensional fast low-angle shot MR fluoroscopy, and T2-weighted short inversion time inversion-recovery). Artifacts were assessed quantitatively by evaluating the areas of signal extinction and calculating equivalent diameters and qualitatively by visual grading. Paired t tests were used to assess the influence of sequence types and field strengths. Artifact diameters ranged from negligible to 45.8 mm. Sequence types and field strength did not have a statistically relevant influence on the artifact size. All artifacts from non-MR imaging-compatible V- and X-shaped markers were rated as "too large;" the artifacts from MR imaging-compatible V- and X-shaped markers and from all anchor-shaped devices were rated as "too small." The highest ratings were achieved by an MR imaging-compatible coil-shaped marker. The artifacts of the tested marking devices are mainly determined by their shapes and materials. Sequence types and field strengths have only a small influence on the artifacts. The most distinguished signal voids with an intermediate size resulted from an MR imaging-compatible coil-shaped marker.

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.