In vitro and in vivo comparison of three different intravascular ultrasound catheter designs.

Abstract

Intravascular ultrasound (IVUS) is an invasive imaging modality, which provides detailed two-dimensional images of blood vessels. There are currently two different types of IVUS catheters available, namely, the phased-array and the mechanical designs. The operating ultrasound frequency of these catheters ranges from 20 to 40 MHz. This study sought to evaluate the image quality, accuracy of diameter and pullback length measurements, and catheter handling characteristics of three different IVUS catheters currently available for clinical use using both in vitro phantom models and in patients undergoing percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI). In gelatin phantom models, image quality assessed on a semiquantitative scale was significantly different between the three IVUS catheters (P = 0.01) with the 40-MHz catheter providing the best images. Accuracy of lumen diameter measurements, when compared to optical microscopy, were similar between the three IVUS catheter designs (all R(2) = 0.99). There were no significant differences in accuracy of pullback length measurements in vitro between the three designs. However, there were differences in the performance of the three IVUS catheters when used for preinterventional imaging in patients undergoing PCI. Both mechanical IVUS catheters were associated with lower procedural, fluoroscopy, and lesion crossing times compared to the phased-array catheter (all P < 0.05). There were no significant differences between the catheters during postinterventional IVUS imaging. There were also small but potentially important differences with regards to clinical events and complications associated with the use of the different IVUS catheters during the PCI procedures, reflecting differences in catheter design.