In This Issue

Abstract

In Brief| September 01 2022 In This Issue Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians (2022) 81 (3): 266–267. https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2022.81.3.266 Connected Content Errata: The Genius of Bureaucracy: SOM’s Hajj Terminal and Geiger Berger Associates’ Form-Finding Software Views Icon Views Article contents Figures & tables Video Audio Supplementary Data Peer Review Share Icon Share Facebook Twitter LinkedIn MailTo Tools Icon Tools Get Permissions Cite Icon Cite Search Site Citation In This Issue. Journal of the Society of Architectural Historians 1 September 2022; 81 (3): 266–267. doi: https://doi.org/10.1525/jsah.2022.81.3.266 Download citation file: Ris (Zotero) Reference Manager EasyBib Bookends Mendeley Papers EndNote RefWorks BibTex toolbar search Search Dropdown Menu toolbar search search input Search input auto suggest filter your search All ContentJournal of the Society of Architectural Historians Search An enduring intellectual and perceptual rift divides the city from the natural world both in scholarship and in the public imagination. In the past three decades, humanities scholars working with social and natural scientists have begun to challenge assumptions about the relations between cities and nature by investigating the complex interactions of cultural and natural systems, exploring how they are inextricably woven together into what is being called the urban landscape. The shift that we are now witnessing in the framing of humanities scholarship on cities and nature offers a vital opportunity for us to develop a broader and more inclusive approach to teaching and conducting research in architectural history as well as urban and environmental studies. The roundtable Rethinking the Urban Landscape, featuring contributions by James Michael Buckley, Theresa A. Cunningham, Liyang Ding, Matthew Gandy, Labib Hossain, Sara Jacobs, Mingqian Liu, Robert Z. Melnick, Laila Seewang, Maria C.... View Original Article You do not currently have access to this content.