Abstract

Scholars have noted similarities between the accounts of the stilling of the storm in Mark 4:35–41 and Jonah’s attempt to run from the commission of Yahweh in Jonah 1. Little attention has been paid, however, to how an allusion to the Jonah narrative might serve the purposes of Mark as he presents Jesus to his readers and hearers. The objectives of this article were to discover: (1) whether there were sufficient similarities between the two accounts to suggest a relationship that might be recognised by Mark’s readers and hearers and (2) whether recognition of similarities and differences in the two accounts might lead readers and hearers to a fuller understanding of Mark’s presentation of Jesus’ person and mission. This study paid attention to the literary structure and the specific terminology of both Mark 4:35–41 and Jonah 1, drawing on studies of the use of the Old Testament in the New Testament by scholars such as J.M. Leonard and R.B. Hays. I discovered: (1) several striking narrative features present in both accounts which might lead someone to recognise similarities between the stories; (2) some common terminology that would reinforce an initial sense of similarity; and (3) significant differences that would lead to Jonah and Jesus being contrasted. I concluded that a neglected connection between these two passages is that both Jesus and Jonah are called to be heralds of God’s message to the nations, but that they respond to that calling in very different ways. I have argued that: (1) Mark does intend his hearers and readers to recognise an echo of the story of Jonah in his account, but (2) the primary significance of the comparison between Jonah and Jesus is not in the similarities (which simply serve to bring the Jonah narrative to mind) but in the differences between these two figures. In particular, (3) the wider context of the narrative in Mark indicates that Jesus (unlike Jonah) is making his crossing in obedience to the commission he has received to be the herald of God to the nations and the two narratives agree in showing that God’s mission will not be thwarted.Contribution: This study highlights that Mark’s account of the stilling of the storm not only contributes to Mark’s Christology but also contributes to a theology of mission, emphasising Jesus’ full engagement in the missio Dei. This fits well with the scope of the journal in terms of its emphasis on both theology and missiology.

Highlights

  • The biblical accounts of Jonah in the storm (Jnh 1) and Jesus stilling the storm (Mk 4:35–41) are amongst the most dramatic narratives in the canon of Scripture

  • When we turn to the Index of Allusions and Verbal Parallels, we find several further references: The only reference outside the Synoptic Gospels is identified as a reference to Jonah 1:17 (2:1 in the LXX) in 1 Corinthians 15:4 where, once again, there is a link between Jonah being ‘three days’ in the belly of the great fish and Jesus having been raised ‘on the third day’

  • I contend that there are ample reasons to suggest that someone steeped in the Old Testament Scriptures who heard or read the stilling of the storm narrative would be reminded strongly of the Jonah story

Read more

Summary

Introduction

The biblical accounts of Jonah in the storm (Jnh 1) and Jesus stilling the storm (Mk 4:35–41) are amongst the most dramatic narratives in the canon of Scripture. This study is important, in my view, for several reasons. It contributes to recent study of ‘echoes’ of and ‘allusions’ to Scripture in the New Testament (Bates 2019; Hays 1989, 2017; Leonard 2008). It contributes to recent work on ‘missional readings’ of the Bible It suggests a reading of a section of Mark’s Gospel that highlights its significance in the context of the wider narrative

Objectives
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call