Abstract

The article discusses cross-cultural leadership and cultural bias in surveys. The author critiques the GLOBE study methodology and suggests that researchers can influence survey conclusions by omitting regionally specific alternatives. He argues that sample sizes are too small to generalize about leadership styles. He offers an alternative method in the Third Culture Bonding (TCB) model which focuses on identifying potential cross-cultural conflicts in Sino-American ventures and developing groups to cope with those sensitivities. The author cautions against applying either GLOBE or TCB methods generally to other cultures.

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.