Abstract

In the present study a protocol of in situ reverse transcriptase‐nested polymerase chain reaction (in situ RT‐nested PCR) was examined based on the following modifications. (i) To exclude false positive signals caused by “DNA repair mechanisms” and “endogenous priming”, a two‐step PCR was applied after reverse transcription. The first step was performed in the presence of extrinsic primers and unlabeled nucleotides with a maximum of PCR cycles possible without destroying the cell morphology. The second step consisted of only one annealing/elongation reaction, the target sequence marked by addition of digoxigenin‐labeled nucleotides and intrinsic primers. (ii) In order to prevent amplifications of genomic DNA nested primer pairs were applied crossing intron sequences. (iii) To minimize the diffusion of PCR products in cells, the extrinsic primers were extended with complementary 5′‐tails. This approach results in the generation of high molecular weight concatamers during PCR cycles. By applying this protocol, immunostainings specific for phospholipase A2 of type IIA mRNA were exclusively detectable in the cytoplasm of HepG2 hepatoma cells, which were used as a model system, whereas the nuclei were unstained. Multiple control experiments yielded completely negative results. These data suggest that the in situ RT‐nested PCR, which in comparison to the method of in situ RT‐PCR‐in situ‐hybridisation is simpler and less time‐consuming, can be used as an alternative approach to identify intracellular nucleic acids.

Highlights

  • In comparison to in situ hybridisation (ISH), the in situ RT-PCR technique provides a higher level of sensitivity, theoretically allowing the identification of a single gene copy per single cell

  • The technique would find application neither in research nor in diagnosis to the extent expected. One explanation of this is that if detection of DNA or RNA is based on the incorporation of labeled nucleotide into amplified products, serious artifacts are possible, generated by (i) the incorporation of nucleotides into fragmented endogenous DNA mediated by the exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases (“DNA repair mechanisms”), (ii) the priming of nonspecific PCR products with cDNA or DNA fragments (“endogenous priming of DNA-fragments”), or (iii) the diffusion of PCR products from the site of synthesis to other sites of the cells, even to neighboring cells (“diffusion artifacts”) [9,10,11,19]

  • In the Southern blot along with the 429 bp product a minor band of length 267 bp was recognizable, whose formation can be explained by the annealing of the intrinsic 5 -primer 150 bp upstream from the extrinsic 5 -primer sequence and the following cutting of the 3 -primer sequence at the 5 -end of the concatamers. (iv) To prevent the nonspecific incorporation of the DIG-labeled nucleotides as part of “DNA repair mechanisms” and “endogenous priming of DNA-fragments”, the cDNA was amplified in two steps in the presence of nested primers

Read more

Summary

Introduction

In comparison to in situ hybridisation (ISH), the in situ RT-PCR technique provides a higher level of sensitivity, theoretically allowing the identification of a single gene copy per single cell. The technique would find application neither in research nor in diagnosis to the extent expected One explanation of this is that if detection of DNA or RNA is based on the incorporation of labeled nucleotide into amplified products, serious artifacts are possible, generated by (i) the incorporation of nucleotides into fragmented endogenous DNA mediated by the exonuclease activity of DNA polymerases (“DNA repair mechanisms”), (ii) the priming of nonspecific PCR products with cDNA or DNA fragments (“endogenous priming of DNA-fragments”), or (iii) the diffusion of PCR products from the site of synthesis to other sites of the cells, even to neighboring cells (“diffusion artifacts”) [9,10,11,19]. Higher technological and time requirements in connection with this technique will largely hinder its broad application, especially in routine laboratory work

Objectives
Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call