Abstract
The success of a polymer/clay nanocomposite depends from a number of factors including the intrinsic properties of the clay, nanofiller dispersion and orientation, matrix/filler interactions, etc. This manuscript focuses on the effect of matrix/filler interphases on the final physical properties of nanocomposite.Two PA6/sepiolite nanocomposites masterbatches are prepared via in situ polymerisation and then diluted via melt-compounding to different filler contents: one based on unreactive pristine sepiolite and another based on reactive amino-silane functionalised sepiolite. This offers a unique comparison opportunity, in which only the latter nanocomposite has PA6 molecules grafted directly from the sepiolite clay. Both nanocomposites are characterised in terms of morphology, thermal behaviour, semi-static tensile tests and dynamic mechanical tests. Interestingly, the grafted-from nanocomposites presented an enhanced strain at break and work of fracture, up to 100% in correspondence of 5wt.% of filler, which is explained by the presence of a “soft” interphase.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
