Abstract

The long-term overall survival of Ewing sarcoma (EWS) patients remains poor; less than 30% of patients with metastatic or recurrent disease survive despite aggressive combinations of chemotherapy, radiation and surgery. To identify new therapeutic options, we employed a multi-pronged approach using in silico predictions of drug activity via an integrated bioinformatics approach in parallel with an in vitro screen of FDA-approved drugs. Twenty-seven drugs and forty-six drugs were identified, respectively, to have anti-proliferative effects for EWS, including several classes of drugs in both screening approaches. Among these drugs, 30 were extensively validated as mono-therapeutic agents and 9 in 14 various combinations in vitro. Two drugs, auranofin, a thioredoxin reductase inhibitor, and ganetespib, an HSP90 inhibitor, were predicted to have anti-cancer activities in silico and were confirmed active across a panel of genetically diverse EWS cells. When given in combination, the survival rate in vivo was superior compared to auranofin or ganetespib alone. Importantly, extensive formulations, dose tolerance, and pharmacokinetics studies demonstrated that auranofin requires alternative delivery routes to achieve therapeutically effective levels of the gold compound. These combined screening approaches provide a rapid means to identify new treatment options for patients with a rare and often-fatal disease.

Highlights

  • Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is a rare, aggressive malignancy of neuroectodermal origin that develops in bones and, less often, in soft tissues [1]

  • Metastatic disease is most commonly located in the lungs (30%), bone and/or bone marrow (30%), and lung metastasis combined with bone and/or bone marrow metastasis (20%) [4]

  • We extended the concept and proposed three computational approaches to predict drugs for EWS from a drug library consisting of 1,335 drugs (Figure 1)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Ewing sarcoma (EWS) is a rare, aggressive malignancy of neuroectodermal origin that develops in bones and, less often, in soft tissues [1]. EWS is the second most common bone malignancy after osteosarcoma [2], and it frequently develops in pediatric and young adult age groups [3]. The most significant prognostic factor for patients with EWS is the presence or absence of overt metastatic disease. Metastatic disease is most commonly located in the lungs (30%), bone and/or bone marrow (30%), and lung metastasis combined with bone and/or bone marrow metastasis (20%) [4]. Other clinical prognostic factors have been found, such as tumor www.impactjournals.com/oncotarget location, tumor size, patient age, and pattern of metastasis [5]. More than 90% of the EWS tumors harbor an (11;22) (q24;q12) translocation that encodes for a EWS/FLI1 fusion protein [7], which functions as a potent oncoprotein with an abnormal transcription factor behavior that leads to aberrant expression of numerous genes and contributes to tumorigenicity [8, 9]

Methods
Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call