Abstract
AbstractWe investigate winter blocking activity over the western North Pacific (WNP) through an intercomparison of four detection methods, which are categorized into two types (anomaly and reversal). Most of the blocking events in the anomaly‐based methods are initiated from the eastern North Pacific. Reversal‐based methods capture the blocking occurrence associated with Rossby wave breaking, especially cyclonic breaking. As the two types capture different aspects of WNP blocking, the resultant regional impact is also largely different. At the onset, anomaly‐based methods show a strong cold anomaly downstream of the blocking in conjunction with a Pacific/North America‐like pattern. Reversal‐based methods indicate a weak cold anomaly in company with a western Pacific‐like pattern, which appears downstream and upstream of the blocking in the local reversal and large‐scale reversal methods, respectively. At the end of WNP blocking, all methods show strong cold anomalies both upstream and downstream of the blocking.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.