Abstract

Estimates of the net exchange of carbon between the terrestrial biosphere and the atmosphere may be too large because the models of carbon release from changes in land use do not allow for enhanced carbon assimilation by the terrestrial biosphere in response to increasing atmospheric CO 2 . We address this deficiency with a model of terrestrial biosphere that includes both ecosystem response to land-use perturbation and vegetation response to atmospheric CO 2 . Model inputs specify the areas affected by land-use change since 1700. The carbon dynamics of the affected areas are described by an area distribution function for vegetation carbon density and a compartment model of carbon in vegetation, litter, and soil. Vegetation growth is modeled as the difference between net primary production (NPP) and mortality. NPP, the net flux of carbon from atmosphere to vegetation, is a logistic function of vegetation carbon density. The response of NPP to atmospheric CO 2 is modeled with three response functions: a logarithmic, a rectangular-hyperbolic, and a response function derived from a biochemical model of C 3 photosynthesis. The response functions are parameterized by ecosystem type with data from CO 2 exposure experiments. Elevated CO 2 affects the NPP of both undisturbed and recovering ecosystems. We use the model to test the hypothesis that the CO 2 enhancement of terrestrial NPP explains the historical missing carbon sink of the global carbon cycle budget. Our estimates of the biosphere's CO 2 enhanced carbon flux are much smaller than the reconstructed missing carbon sink. We conclude that our model results do not support the hypothesis. DOI: 10.1034/j.1600-0889.47.issue4.9.x

Full Text
Paper version not known

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call

Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.