Abstract
those days?1 This question about an eighteenth-century portrait of four American children essentially states widespread scholarly and antiquarian view of children in colonial America. Not only is it assumed that colonial Americans treated their children differently than we do today, but it is also believed that they regarded their children and recognized no stage of development like twentieth-century adolescence. While this essay does not suggest that colonial Americans treated their children we treat ours, it does conclude that notions of and absence of adolescence in colonial New England are, at best, exaggerations. Much of myth of miniature adulthood stems from belief that children in colonial portraits appeared old and dressed like their parents. Until Revolution, writes Alice Morse Earle, as soon boy put on breeches he dressed precisely like his father-in miniature.2 According to Arthur M. Schlesinger, the older generation late Independence still displayed its basic assumption that children were miniature adults by continuing to dress young like little grownups.... The vital distinction between youth and age yet remained unrecognized.3 Monica Kiefer finds that eighteenth-century children occupied a submerged position in an adult
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.