Abstract
ABSTRACT The Parenting Coordinator (PC) model of alternate dispute resolution (ADR) diverts cases involving frequent child custody modification and enforcement disputes out of the courtroom to a private decision-maker working informally with the family. This article examines the legal and social policy considerations that go into developing a form stipulation and order appointing a PC for use in California family courts, where there is no statutory basis for appointment of a PC. Those same considerations will be important in other states that do not have enabling legislation, and in the development of enabling legislation and court rules. In California, the statutory provisions governing contractual arbitration carry the most promise for ensuring enforceability of the process, if appellate courts accept the consensual delegation of judicial authority to determine children's best interests. Stipulations that are modest in the scope of authority given to the PC and provide for judicial supervision stand the greatest chance of approval by appellate courts.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.