Abstract
The hypothesis that the price adjustment to nominal shocks is instantaneous has been part of the monetarist approach explaining the inflationary process in Argentina. But the authors argue that monetary and exchange rate policies have had different effects on relative prices and thus have a significant influence on the real side of the economy. The existence of rigidities has prevented full and instantaneous price adjustments. Recent work on inflation in imperfectly competitive markets explain rigidities as a consequence of firms' strategic responses to nominal shocks, which in turn depend on the market structure and demand elasticities faced by firms. Price rigidities emerge when firms facing changes in aggregate demand behave collusively, and there are costs for customers to switch between suppliers. In contrast, when the costs for customers to switch between suppliers are low, firms are obliged to adjust their prices to new demand conditions, otherwise they will lose their customers. Changes in foreign prices affect domestic prices depending on the degree of foreign competition and the price formation mechanism in each sector. As expected, price rigidities are minimal in tradable sectors where firms react to these changes by changing their prices almost instantaneously. The response in nontradable activities depends on indirect effects and whether prices are indexed to a foreign currency. Because understanding this is essential for effective policymaking, the authors analyze price behavior of four economic sectors - agriculture, industry, (retail) commerce, and services - in Argentina from 1981-94. The econometric analysis show large differences in the price behavior across sectors. Firms do not respond uniformly to changes in production costs, foreign prices, and demand conditions. The response of individual prices reflects the distribution of adjustment costs across sectors in the case of nominal shocks. To maintain social and political stability, the government's challenge is to minimize divergence across sectors. Increasing competition appears to be a crucial element of this strategy since monopolistic power is frequently associated with the existence of price rigidities.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.