In Search of Best Practices in Responsible Gaming (RG): A Comparative Study of RG among Macau, Las Vegas, and Melbourne Casinos

Abstract

Gaming Law Review and EconomicsVol. 18, No. 4 ArticlesIn Search of Best Practices in Responsible Gaming (RG): A Comparative Study of RG among Macau, Las Vegas, and Melbourne CasinosZhidong Hao, Linda Hancock, and William N. ThompsonZhidong HaoSearch for more papers by this author, Linda HancockSearch for more papers by this author, and William N. ThompsonSearch for more papers by this authorPublished Online:16 May 2014https://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2014.1845AboutSectionsPDF/EPUB Permissions & CitationsPermissionsDownload CitationsTrack CitationsAdd to favorites Back To Publication ShareShare onFacebookTwitterLinked InRedditEmail FiguresReferencesRelatedDetailsCited byA Comparison of Two GameSense Implementation Approaches: How Program Awareness and Engagement Relate to Gambling Beliefs and Behaviors23 February 2021 | Journal of Gambling Studies, Vol. 38, No. 1Strategies for Social and Environmental Disclosure: The Case of Multinational Gambling Companies25 May 2019 | Journal of Business Ethics, Vol. 168, No. 3Legitimacy-seeking strategies in the gambling industry: the case of responsible gamblingSustainability Accounting, Management and Policy Journal, Vol. 10, No. 1Critiquing the Reno Model I-IV International Influence on Regulators and Governments (2004–2015)— the Distorted Reality of “Responsible Gambling”24 April 2017 | International Journal of Mental Health and Addiction, Vol. 15, No. 6 Volume 18Issue 4May 2014 InformationCopyright 2014, Mary Ann Liebert, Inc.To cite this article:Zhidong Hao, Linda Hancock, and William N. Thompson.In Search of Best Practices in Responsible Gaming (RG): A Comparative Study of RG among Macau, Las Vegas, and Melbourne Casinos.Gaming Law Review and Economics.May 2014.361-368.http://doi.org/10.1089/glre.2014.1845Published in Volume: 18 Issue 4: May 16, 2014PDF download