Abstract
We welcome a critique from our Denver friend and colleague, with his long experience in validating screening tests. No criticism of the DDST as a developmental screen was intended in our article. We merely wanted to make the point Dr Frankenburg himself has so succinctly stated that "outcome measures . . . such as syntax and articulation problems, are not even ascertained with the DDST test. . . ." The justification for our proposal that a language screening test like the ELM be used is, indeed, that the DDST is not a comprehensive language screen, as Dr Frankenburg concedes.
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
