Abstract
CRITICISM IN QUEST OF ROBIN HOOD Robert E. Morsberger The line between fact and fiction is dimly drawn in folk literature, but most legends seem to have origins, however faint and elusive, in history. There was a war at Troy; Charlemagne did leave a small force to fight a rear action at Roncevalles; and Beowulfs uncle Hygelac was killed in a fight recorded by Gregory of Tours. In England, King Arthur may have been one Artorius, a leader in resisting Saxon invasions. But Arthur was largely the property of the Norman aristocracy; the common folk had their own hero in Robin Hood. Did he also play a role in history, or is he merely the creation of popular imagination? The existing Robin Hood literature is contained in many ballads, some dating from the fifteenth century but many found in texts not older than the sixteenth or seventeenth centuries. There is also a popular epic, The Gest of Robin Hood, dating from about 1500 but compiled from older ballads. Like most ballads, this literature is highly unstable and unreliable in recording historical events, though it reveals certain historical attitudes and experiences. This unreliability has caused some scholars to conclude that Robin Hood never existed. Francis James Child, the great ballad editor of the nineteenth century, said, "Robin Hood is absolutely a creation of the ballad-muse."1 Other critics look to more exotic sources and try to establish Robin as a creature of mythology who was later humanized by the ballads. Such mythological theories relate the outlaw to geographical names and features, suggesting that he was a forest deity, a wood or water sprite, a pagan lord of springtime , the Aryan sun god, the blind archer Hödr who slew Balder, or even a degraded form of Odin. Developed in detail, such interpretations are ingenious but strain credulity. The question still remains as to whether Robin Hood was historical or merely a fictitious representative of the outlaw classes that dwelt in the forests of medieval England. Scott's Ivanhoe and the derring-do of Douglas Fairbanks , Errol Flynn, and more recent motion picture Robins have popularized the belief that Robin Hood was a patriotic outlawed nobleman who flourished during the reign of Richard I and helped the Lion Heart to regain his sovereignty, usurped by his wicked brother John during the Third Crusade. This does make the best story, and there are persuasive arguments in its favor, but they are inconclusive. Many scholars place Robin later in history, putting !Francis James Child, ed., The English and Scottish Popular Ballads (Boston and New York: Houghton Mifflin and Company, 1890), HL 42. 75 76RMMLA BulletinSeptember 1971 him variously in the reigns of Henry III or the first three Edwards. Others try to place him even earlier than Richard I, while one writer who styled himself "an ingenious antiquary" placed him as late as Henry VIII. The earliest definite known reference to Robin Hood occurs in the B-text of Piers Plowman, which Skeat dated as 1377.2 There, Sloth says: I can nouzte perfitly my pater-noster : as the prest it syngeth, But I can rymes of Robin Hood · and Randolf erle of Chestre . . .3 The date of this definitely rules out any possibility that Robin Hood existed during the reign of Henry VIII. Fordun, the Scottish historian, writing in the middle of the fourteenth century, spoke of Robin Hood and Little John and connected them with the reign of Henry III.* Fordun's pupil Bower, abbot of St. Colomb, claimed that Robin Hood was an outlaw in 1266.5 Wyntoun, writing in 1420, dated Robin's activities at the year 1283.6 Holinshed wrote that Robin Hood and Little John were outlaws in 1189, and that Robin was betrayed at a nunnery in Scotland called Bricklies [doubtless Kirklees], after which the band scattered.7 Robin Hood does not appear as the disinherited Earl of Huntington until his presence in the plays of Anthony Munday and Henry Chettle in the late sixteenth century. These plays also introduce Maid Marian as Robin's love, the daughter of Lord Fitzwater, and connect Robin's adventures with Richard I, even making Queen Eleanor of Aquitaine enamored...
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
More From: Bulletin of the Rocky Mountain Modern Language Association
Disclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.