Abstract

Literature suggests that consumers expect disutility not only from payment uncertainties but also from reference uncertainties embedded in mobile plans. This paper develops a model of mobile plan choice incorporating both reference and payment uncertainties and uses this model to derive testable implications. The paper argues that consumer choice reflects those uncertainties more than could be justified by rational choice theory. Such patterns, the paper hypothesizes, would be more salient in the choice of data plan than voice plan because consumers tend to perceive data usage to be less controllable than voice usage, thus preferring the plan that reduces uncertainty. The paper tests the predictions with data from a laboratory study analyzing a series of choices between plans with different tariff structures—flat-rate, two-part, and three-part tariffs. As predicted, the results suggest that payment and reference uncertainties create significant disutility for consumers, especially when they perceive high uncertainty about their usage. Such understanding of consumer preference and underlying psychological biases is important in the sense that it provides an essential basis for the development of sustainable mobile policy.

Highlights

  • Since the introduction of smartphones to South Korea in 2009, mobile data have become central to mobile telecommunications services. (Further, since 2014, voice and text message services have become free peripheral services that are provided with the mobile data service in most mobile plans in Korea.) Most mobile subscription plans since have adopted a threepart tariff structure: fixed fee, initial usage allowance, and an additional charge for excess usage

  • The subjects’ choices between the pairs of plans reveal the following. (i) They seem to be indifferent between the flat-rate and the three-part tariff in voice usage, but they prefer the flat-rate over the three-part tariff in data usage. (ii) They prefer the three-part tariffs over the two-part tariffs in both types of usage

  • It seems that controllability possibly reduces reference uncertainty more than usage uncertainty, which could explain why the preference for three-part tariffs over two-part tariffs is stronger in data usage

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Since the introduction of smartphones to South Korea (hereafter, Korea) in 2009, mobile data (rather than voice calls and text messages) have become central to mobile telecommunications services. (Further, since 2014, voice and text message services have become free peripheral services that are provided with the mobile data service in most mobile plans in Korea.) Most mobile subscription plans since have adopted a threepart tariff structure: fixed fee, initial usage allowance, and an additional charge for excess usage. With the three-part tariff structure, they have one more component to utilize for optimal pricing Their average revenue stream per user is more stable with the three-part tariff structure, which usually involves charging a higher fixed fee and provides initial usage allowance. A few studies (e.g., [1,2]) indicate a preference for usage-based tariffs, the majority of previous studies on mobile plan choice (e.g., [3,4,5,6,7]) demonstrate the existence of a preference for flat-rate tariffs or three-part tariffs with higher initial usage allowance over usage-based tariffs Such preference is observed even when usage-based tariffs are optimal given the consumers’ usage patterns. As a result of the suboptimal choices, consumers either overpay for their services (e.g., [8,9]) or increase their usage to deplete their allowance (e.g., [6])

Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call