Abstract

In order to enable systematic analyses of the numerous solutions to the Arab-Israeli conflict this study presents a model that maps them into a general typology along the continuum between the poles of Arab dominance over the country and Israeli dominance. Six prototypes of solution are identified: (a) no Jews; (b) one bi-national state; (c) twostate partition; (d) partial annexation partition; (e) one Jewish state; (f) no Arabs (meaning their transfer elsewhere). The groups of solutions form a model for mapping suggestions for conflict resolution. With this model any additional solution not mentioned here is bound to fall within one of the groups of suggestions for conflict resolution. The next stage of this study refers to the six prototypes and examines their ideological foundations and origins within Zionist thought and action; and, finally, the suggested model constructs the framework for an assessment of which geopolitical arrangement is most likely to form the most desirable form of settlement from an Israeli point of view. In its concluding stage, then, this paper evaluates the practicability of each peace-solution prototype and, since none of the prototypes prove to have any real probability, the idea of the non-solution solution is introduced and recommended.

Highlights

  • Opening: The solution discourse and the suggested mapping modelIt was late in the morning, on Monday, December 27, 2011, and the central auditorium of the Ariel University in Samaria was filled to capacity

  • Tzur has managed to collect 25 peace plans, but one should honestly admit that his remarkable work was, and is, just one example from a whole industry of conflict solution-seeking in the Middle East

  • In an attempt to create some order for the numerous peace plans, this study offers a model that maps out a general typology of solutions along the continuum between Arab dominance over the country on one pole and Israeli dominance on the other

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Opening: The solution discourse and the suggested mapping modelIt was late in the morning, on Monday, December 27, 2011, and the central auditorium of the Ariel University in Samaria was filled to capacity. In one part of this map, more typical of the political Left in Israel than the right, within the boundaries of an approach that assumes Arab dominance over most of the land; we find three characteristic groups of solutions: (a) no Jewsmeaning evacuation of the Jewish population; (b) one state-meaning a bi-national approach; (c) partition-meaning territorial concessions.

Results
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call