Abstract

This paper presents an experimental investigation into the structural and material response of ambient-dry and wet clay-brick/lime-mortar masonry elements. In addition to cyclic tests on four large-scale masonry walls subjected to lateral in-plane displacement and co-existing compressive gravity load, the study also includes complementary tests on square masonry panels under diagonal compression and cylindrical masonry cores in compression. After describing the specimen details, wetting method and testing arrangements, the main results and observations are provided and discussed. The results obtained from full-field digital image correlation measurements enable a detailed assessment of the material shear-compression strength envelope, and permit a direct comparison with the strength characteristics of structural walls. The full load-deformation behaviour of the large-scale walls is also evaluated, including their ductility and failure modes, and compared with the predictions of available assessment models. It is shown that moisture has a notable effect on the main material properties, including the shear and compression strengths, brick–mortar interaction parameters, and the elastic and shear moduli. The extent of the moisture effects is a function of the governing behaviour and material characteristics as well as the interaction between shear and precompression stresses, and can lead to a loss of more than a third of the stiffness and strength. For the large scale wall specimens subjected to lateral loading and co-existing compression, the wet-to-dry reduction was found to be up to 20% and 11% in terms of stiffness and lateral strength, respectively, whilst the ductility ratio diminished by up to 12%. Overall, provided that the key moisture-dependent material properties are appropriately evaluated, it is shown that analytical assessment methods can be reliably adapted for predicting the response, in terms of the lateral stiffness, strength and overall load-deformation, for both dry and wet masonry walls.

Highlights

  • Historic masonry elements are rarely provided with adequate insulation systems to prevent capillary absorption, yet are often partly or fully submersed in groundwater (Hoła et al 2017)

  • The influence of moisture on the diagonal cracking response was examined in push-only lateral load tests, the influence of load reversals combined with moisture on clay brick lime mortar masonry has not been investigated

  • Previous tests on masonry elements have shown larger differences between dry and wet conditions, this is highly dependent on the material porosity, and such ranges are common for materials similar to those investigated in this paper (Sathiparan and Rumeshkumar 2018; Amade et al 2004; Bompa and Elghazouli 2020b)

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Historic masonry elements are rarely provided with adequate insulation systems to prevent capillary absorption, yet are often partly or fully submersed in groundwater (Hoła et al 2017). The compressive and tensile mechanical properties of wet brick lime mortar masonry subjected to in-situ push-only cyclic loading were reported to be 30% and 36% lower, respectively, than those of corresponding members in dry conditions (Kržan et al 2015b) These reductions were attributed to the very low modulus of elasticity of wet masonry compared to its dry counterpart, with the mortar exhibiting stiffness equal to that of saturated sand. The influence of moisture on the diagonal cracking response was examined in push-only lateral load tests, the influence of load reversals combined with moisture on clay brick lime mortar masonry has not been investigated These aspects of behaviour are important for assessing the structural robustness of heritage structures. In addition to providing information for future validation of detailed nonlinear cyclic numerical simulations, the results enable the assessment of the material shear-compression strength envelopes as well as the adequacy of available analytical models in terms of stiffness, strength and load-deformation response

Material properties and mix designs
Small scale tests
Large walls under combined loading
Test set‐ups and loading procedures
Instrumentation details
Small scale specimens
Large scale wall tests
Load‐deformation and crack patterns
Response envelopes and ductility levels
Shear‐compression failure envelopes
Stiffness and strength of large walls
Idealised lateral load‐deformation curves
Findings
Conclusions
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call