Abstract

BackgroundAlthough recent models suggest that the detection of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) in epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition (EM CTC) might be related to disease progression in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, current detection methods are not efficient in identifying this subpopulation of cells. Furthermore, the possible association of EM CTC with both clinicopathological features and prognosis of MBC patients has still to be demonstrated. Aims of this study were: first, to optimize a DEPArray-based protocol meant to identify, quantify and sort single, viable EM CTC and, subsequently, to test the association of EM CTC frequency with clinical data.MethodsThis prospective observational study enrolled 56 MBC patients regardless of the line of treatment. Blood samples, depleted of CD45pos leukocytes, were stained with an antibody cocktail recognizing both epithelial and mesenchymal markers. Four CD45neg cell subpopulations were identified: cells expressing only epithelial markers (E CTC), cells co-expressing epithelial and mesenchymal markers (EM CTC), cells expressing only mesenchymal markers (MES) and cells negative for every tested marker (NEG). CTC subpopulations were quantified as both absolute cell count and relative frequency. The association of CTC subpopulations with clinicopathological features, progression free survival (PFS), and overall survival (OS) was explored by Wilcoxon-Mann-Whitney test and Univariate Cox Regression Analysis, respectively.ResultsBy employing the DEPArray-based strategy, we were able to assess the presence of cells pertaining to the above-described classes in every MBC patient. We observed a significant association between specific CD45neg subpopulations and tumor subtypes (e.g. NEG and triple negative), proliferation (NEG and Ki67 expression) and sites of metastatic spread (e.g. E CTC and bone; NEG and brain). Importantly, the fraction of CD45neg cells co-expressing epithelial and mesenchymal markers (EM CTC) was significantly associated with poorer PFS and OS, computed, this latter, both from the diagnosis of a stage IV disease and from the initial CTC assessment.ConclusionThis study suggests the importance of dissecting the heterogeneity of CTC in MBC. Precise characterization of CTC could help in estimating both metastatization pattern and outcome, driving clinical decision-making and surveillance strategies.Electronic supplementary materialThe online version of this article (doi:10.1186/s13058-016-0687-3) contains supplementary material, which is available to authorized users.

Highlights

  • Recent models suggest that the detection of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) in epithelialto-mesenchymal transition (EM CTC) might be related to disease progression in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, current detection methods are not efficient in identifying this subpopulation of cells

  • Patient recruitment and baseline characteristics This study enrolled 56 MBC patients treated at the University Hospital of Udine between March 2013 and May 2015, regardless of the line of treatment

  • CTC assessment was performed before the beginning of a new therapeutic line

Read more

Summary

Introduction

Recent models suggest that the detection of Circulating Tumor Cells (CTC) in epithelialto-mesenchymal transition (EM CTC) might be related to disease progression in metastatic breast cancer (MBC) patients, current detection methods are not efficient in identifying this subpopulation of cells. Current models suggest that the invasive phenotype of breast cancers is mostly associated with an epithelial-tomesenchymal transition (EMT) [11] This process leads to the expression of mesenchymal markers on tumor cells, which is paralleled by an increase in the migration and invasion properties of tumor cells, as well as in their resistance to apoptosis and ability to evade the immune response [11]. The only Food and Drug Administration (FDA)-approved device to detect CTC, the CellSearch System (Veridex, Warren, NJ, USA), allows counting only epithelial cell adhesion molecule (EpCAM)-positive epithelial CTC This device does not allow harvesting viable CTC suitable for downstream analyses. For most of these a clinical validation is still missing [14]

Objectives
Methods
Results
Discussion
Conclusion
Full Text
Published version (Free)

Talk to us

Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have

Schedule a call