Abstract
Healthcare chaplaincy research seems further advanced in the USA. Here a US patient satisfaction with chaplaincy instrument (PSI-C-R) was used in a London NHS foundation hospital with a multi-faith chaplaincy team and population. A version of the instrument was also generated for the bereaved. PSI-C-R had not been subjected to test-retest to confirm its reliability so this was done at the pilot stage. It proved only partly reliable, but in three separate surveys a cluster of highly rated factors emerged, as in earlier studies: chaplains' prayer, competence, listening skills and spiritual sensitivity. Low-rated factors and qualitative data highlighted areas for improvement. Disappointing response rates arose from patient acuity, ethical concerns about standard follow-up protocols, and the Western Christian origins of the instrument which requires further revision for multi-faith settings, or the design of new instruments.
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
