Abstract
Hydrogen peroxide is an environment‐friendly oxidizer, which is used in several chemical processes. However, safety necessitates the determination and control of the concentration of hydrogen peroxide during oxidation reactions. We propose a methodology to monitor hydrogen peroxide in disperse two‐phase reaction mixtures based on in‐line Raman spectroscopy. We compare indirect hard modeling (IHM), peak integration (PI), and partial least squares (PLS). Building predictive PLS and PI calibration models is challenging, whereas the IHM calibration is easy to develop. These methods show good accuracy for known samples (root mean square error of cross validation [RMSECV] of 0.3–0.7 wt %) compared to the classic titration method (RMSECV of 0.4 wt %). After calibration, inline monitoring during reaction is performed demonstrating that the concentration of hydrogen peroxide can be successfully monitored in a fast and reliable way by Raman spectroscopy. The IHM seems to give slightly better inline predictions. © 2017 American Institute of Chemical Engineers AIChE J, 63: 3994–4002, 2017
Sign-in/Register to access full text options 
Talk to us
Join us for a 30 min session where you can share your feedback and ask us any queries you have
Schedule a callDisclaimer: All third-party content on this website/platform is and will remain the property of their respective owners and is provided on "as is" basis without any warranties, express or implied. Use of third-party content does not indicate any affiliation, sponsorship with or endorsement by them. Any references to third-party content is to identify the corresponding services and shall be considered fair use under The CopyrightLaw.
